<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>one digital life &#187; Adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/tag/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com</link>
	<description>the personal weblog of paul burd, multimedia designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is After Effects Gobbling Up Your Hard&#160;Drive?</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/04/20/is-after-effects-gobbling-up-your-hard-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/04/20/is-after-effects-gobbling-up-your-hard-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[After Effects CS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cache.MACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=2103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I recently discovered that After Effects (CS3) wasn&#8217;t deleting it&#8217;s Media Cache files when I quit the application. The folder had swelled to 6.19 GB.
I&#8217;m not sure if this is a bug in CS3, or if all versions of AE suffered from this problem. But, if you&#8217;re an After Effects user you may want to [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/04/20/is-after-effects-gobbling-up-your-hard-drive/">Is After Effects Gobbling Up Your Hard&nbsp;Drive?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="primary"><img src="http://www.onedigitallife.com/images/adobe-after-effects-cache-macc.jpg" height="268" width="500" alt="Adobe After Effects CS3 Cache - Cache.MACC" /></p>
<p>I recently discovered that <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/" target="_blank">After Effects</a> (CS3) wasn&#8217;t deleting it&#8217;s Media Cache files when I quit the application. The folder had swelled to 6.19 GB.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this is a bug in CS3, or if all versions of AE suffered from this problem. But, if you&#8217;re an After Effects user you may want to make sure you haven&#8217;t (unnecessarily) lost some drive space. On a Mac, the folder is located at <code>~/Library/Caches/Adobe/After Effects CS3/Media Cache Files.</code> You can either manually toss the content of the folder, or you can open AE on go to the <em>Memory &#038; Cache</em> preferences and click, <em>Clean Database &#038; Cache</em>.</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/04/20/is-after-effects-gobbling-up-your-hard-drive/">Is After Effects Gobbling Up Your Hard&nbsp;Drive?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/04/20/is-after-effects-gobbling-up-your-hard-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Addresses Security Vulnerabilities in Flash, but not Acrobat or&#160;Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/02/25/adobe-addresses-security-vulnerabilities-in-flash-but-not-acrobat-or-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/02/25/adobe-addresses-security-vulnerabilities-in-flash-but-not-acrobat-or-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acrobat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe has released a new version of the Flash plugin for Mac, Windows, and Linux, that addresses a serious security vulnerability. The update fixes a critical flaw which could cause your computer to be hacked merely by viewing a malicious SWF (Shockwave Flash) file, according to Adobe&#8217;s advisory
Adobe has a Web page that will automatically [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/02/25/adobe-addresses-security-vulnerabilities-in-flash-but-not-acrobat-or-reader/">Adobe Addresses Security Vulnerabilities in Flash, but not Acrobat or&nbsp;Reader</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has released a new version of the Flash plugin for Mac, Windows, and Linux, that addresses a serious security vulnerability. The update fixes a critical flaw which could cause your computer to be hacked merely by viewing a malicious SWF (Shockwave Flash) file, according to <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html" target="_blank">Adobe&#8217;s advisory</a></p>
<p>Adobe has a <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flash/about/" target="_blank">Web page</a> that will automatically display what Flash version you&#8217;re using, and allow you to download the update, if needed.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, there&#8217;s no fix yet for a serious security flaw in Adobe Acrobat and Reader that was reported a few weeks ago. (More Info at <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139007/2009/02/acrobat_vulnerability.html" target="_blank">Macworld</a>)</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139030/2009/02/adobeflash.html?lsrc=rss_main" target="_blank">Macworld</a></p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/02/25/adobe-addresses-security-vulnerabilities-in-flash-but-not-acrobat-or-reader/">Adobe Addresses Security Vulnerabilities in Flash, but not Acrobat or&nbsp;Reader</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2009/02/25/adobe-addresses-security-vulnerabilities-in-flash-but-not-acrobat-or-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More big names pulling out of Macworld&#160;2009</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/05/more-big-names-pulling-out-of-macworld-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/05/more-big-names-pulling-out-of-macworld-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe pulled out the other day. Now Belkin, Seagate, and Creative Labs have done the same. Google, Marware, and others have stayed in, but reduced the size of their booths. It&#8217;s just not going to be the same this year. [ LINK ]
This is a blog post from: one digital life.More big names pulling out [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/05/more-big-names-pulling-out-of-macworld-2009/">More big names pulling out of Macworld&nbsp;2009</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe pulled out the other day. Now Belkin, Seagate, and Creative Labs have done the same. Google, Marware, and others have stayed in, but reduced the size of their booths. It&#8217;s just not going to be the same this year. [ <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/04/more_big_names_downsizing_pulling_out_of_macworld_expo.html" target="_blank">LINK</a> ]</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/05/more-big-names-pulling-out-of-macworld-2009/">More big names pulling out of Macworld&nbsp;2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/05/more-big-names-pulling-out-of-macworld-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe won&#8217;t have a booth at Macworld Expo&#160;2009?</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/02/adobe-wont-have-a-booth-at-macworld-expo-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/02/adobe-wont-have-a-booth-at-macworld-expo-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=1902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t like this one bit. I was actually looking forward to stopping at the Adobe booth and talking to those guys. [ LINK ]
This is a blog post from: one digital life.Adobe won&#8217;t have a booth at Macworld Expo&#160;2009?
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/02/adobe-wont-have-a-booth-at-macworld-expo-2009/">Adobe won&#8217;t have a booth at Macworld Expo&nbsp;2009?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like this one bit. I was actually looking forward to stopping at the Adobe booth and talking to those guys. [ <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/137244/2008/12/adobeexpo.html?lsrc=rss_main" target="_blank">LINK</a> ]</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/02/adobe-wont-have-a-booth-at-macworld-expo-2009/">Adobe won&#8217;t have a booth at Macworld Expo&nbsp;2009?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/12/02/adobe-wont-have-a-booth-at-macworld-expo-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Releases Lightroom&#160;2</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/29/adobe-releases-lightroom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/29/adobe-releases-lightroom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=1868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yay! Adobe released Lightroom 2 this morning. I&#8217;m a big fan of Lightroom and this version offers some welcome enhancements. An upgrade will cost you $99. Regular price is still $299.
 If you want a guided tour, the National Association of Photoshop Professionals (NAPP) has produced a whole series of videos outlining the new features. [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/29/adobe-releases-lightroom-2/">Adobe Releases Lightroom&nbsp;2</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Adobe released <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Lightroom 2</a> this morning. I&#8217;m a big fan of Lightroom and this version offers some <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/features/" target="_blank">welcome enhancements</a>. An upgrade will cost you $99. Regular price is still $299.</p>
<p> If you want a guided tour, the National Association of Photoshop Professionals (NAPP) has produced a whole series of videos outlining the new features. You can see them <a href="http://www.photoshopuser.com/lightroom2/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/29/adobe-releases-lightroom-2/">Adobe Releases Lightroom&nbsp;2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/29/adobe-releases-lightroom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PDF Adopted as International&#160;Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe has released control of their PDF format to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Read more about it at AppleInsider or Macworld.
This is a blog post from: one digital life.PDF Adopted as International&#160;Standard
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/">PDF Adopted as International&nbsp;Standard</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has released control of their PDF format to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Read more about it at <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/07/02/adobes_pdf_format_now_an_iso_standard.html" target="_blank">AppleInsider</a> or <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/134262/2008/07/isopdf.html" target="_blank">Macworld</a>.</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/">PDF Adopted as International&nbsp;Standard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/07/02/pdf-adopted-as-international-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe ships Acrobat 9 / Adds Fireworks to CS3 Design&#160;Premium</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acrobat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe has started shipping Acrobat 9. If you own the Design Premium CS3 bundle, you can upgrade to a new version of the bundle that now includes Acrobat 9 Pro and Fireworks CS3 for $159.
This is a blog post from: one digital life.Adobe ships Acrobat 9 / Adds Fireworks to CS3 Design&#160;Premium
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/">Adobe ships Acrobat 9 / Adds Fireworks to CS3 Design&nbsp;Premium</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has started shipping Acrobat 9. If you own the Design Premium CS3 bundle, you can upgrade to a new version of the bundle that now includes Acrobat 9 Pro and Fireworks CS3 for $159.</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/">Adobe ships Acrobat 9 / Adds Fireworks to CS3 Design&nbsp;Premium</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/06/25/adobe-ships-acrobat-9-adds-fireworks-to-cs3-design-premium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Drops Giant Turd on Director&#160;Community</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Like many others, I&#8217;ve been patiently waiting for Macromedia Adobe to update Director for quite some time now. The product hasn&#8217;t seen an update since 2004, and even that one wasn&#8217;t that hot. After years of no news whatsoever, Adobe finally announced Director 11 in February, and it began shipping this past Tuesday.
My first reaction [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/">Adobe Drops Giant Turd on Director&nbsp;Community</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="primary"><img src="http://www.onedigitallife.com/images/adobe-director-11.jpg" alt="Adobe Director 11" width="500" height="317"></p>
<p>Like many others, I&#8217;ve been patiently waiting for <s>Macromedia</s> Adobe to update <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/director/" target="_blank">Director</a> for quite some time now. The product hasn&#8217;t seen an update since 2004, and even that one wasn&#8217;t that hot. After years of no news whatsoever, Adobe finally announced Director 11 in February, and it began shipping this past Tuesday.</p>
<p>My first reaction to Director 11&#8230; Adobe, you should be ashamed of yourself for charging money for this piece of crap!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Director user, the $299 upgrade basically buys you official support for Windows Vista and Intel Macs. That&#8217;s it! Any other (minor) features boasted by Adobe are over-hyped and under-delivered. For all practical purposes, this release should have been called Director 10.2, and given to us as a free update. As evidence to how little has actually changed in Director, the first thing the app does when you launch it is phone home to Macromedia.com.</p>
<p>In terms of Mac support, the new Director is extremely limited. Although Director 11 shipped 6 months after Leopard, <strong>Leopard is not officially supported for authoring or playback.</strong> For authoring, Director 11 only supports 10.4 on an Intel Mac. Director 11 does support playback on PPC based Macs, but also only on 10.4&#8230; nothing older, and nothing newer. I have done some preliminary testing running Director 11 under Leopard, and so far everything seems to work OK. There is no word from Adobe on when Director will officially gain Leopard support.</p>
<p>One other item that should be mentioned about Director now being able to run natively on Intel Macs is, none of your existing Xtras will work. All previous  (Mac) Director Xtras are PPC only. You&#8217;ll need to get updates for all of those before they&#8217;ll work with Director 11.</p>
<p>Adobe also now boasts, <em>&#8220;support for more than 40 video, audio, and image file formats&#8221;</em>. Of course, they won&#8217;t tell us what formats those are exactly. I can&#8217;t find a list anywhere. I guess it&#8217;s up to us to guess. I can tell you 2 that are NOT supported&#8230; PDF, and Flash video (flv). I was shocked by this! Considering the fact that those two formats are core components of Adobe&#8217;s distribution system, how could they not build in support? Adobe Illustrator is also not one of those mysterious 40 formats, which is surprising since Adobe announced <em>full Creative Suite compatibility</em> when they first announced Director 11. They&#8217;ve since removed that statement from their site.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just one last complaint I want to voice. This one is extremely minor, and pretty nit-picky, but I think it illustrates Adobe&#8217;s commitment to Director&#8230; They couldn&#8217;t even be bothered to make a custom folder icon like they do for all of their other applications. How freakin lazy is that?</p>
<p>My best advise&#8230; if you don&#8217;t really need Vista or Intel Mac support right now, then don&#8217;t bother buying Director 11. Unfortunately, I had to. :(</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/">Adobe Drops Giant Turd on Director&nbsp;Community</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/03/27/adobe-drops-giant-turd-on-director-community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTime 7.4 not fully compatible with After&#160;Effects</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[After Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickTime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently there&#8217;s some incompatibilities with QuickTime 7.4 and Adobe After Effects 7 and CS3 (8). [LINK] Check out the comments for more information.
Update: It looks like the problem is also with Adobe Premier. It springs from the DRM associated with iTunes rentals. Apple and Adobe are working on it. [LINK]
Update: The problem appears to be [...]<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/">QuickTime 7.4 not fully compatible with After&nbsp;Effects</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently there&#8217;s some incompatibilities with QuickTime 7.4 and Adobe After Effects 7 and CS3 (8). [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/01/23/after-effects-7-users-quicktime-7-4-update-a-nono/" target="_blank">LINK</a>] Check out the comments for more information.</p>
<p class="updated"><strong>Update:</strong> It looks like the problem is also with Adobe Premier. It springs from the DRM associated with iTunes rentals. Apple and Adobe are working on it. [<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/131809/2008/01/quicktime.html" target="_blank">LINK</a>]</p>
<p class="updated"><strong>Update:</strong> The problem appears to be fixed now, with the release of QuickTime 7.4.1. [<a href="http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20080207061646465" target="_blank">LINK</a>]</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/">QuickTime 7.4 not fully compatible with After&nbsp;Effects</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/24/quicktime-74-not-fully-compatible-with-after-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photoshop CS3 tool inaccuracy under&#160;Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quickies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t experienced the bugs myself, but apparently there are known issues with some of the tools in Photoshop CS3 under Leopard. A fix is likely coming in Mac OS X 10.5.2 [LINK]
This is a blog post from: one digital life.Photoshop CS3 tool inaccuracy under&#160;Leopard
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/">Photoshop CS3 tool inaccuracy under&nbsp;Leopard</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t experienced the bugs myself, but apparently there are known issues with some of the tools in Photoshop CS3 under Leopard. A fix is likely coming in Mac OS X 10.5.2 [<a href="http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20080107160607729" target="_blank">LINK</a>]</p>
<p>This is a blog post from: <a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com">one digital life</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/">Photoshop CS3 tool inaccuracy under&nbsp;Leopard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2008/01/09/photoshop-cs3-tool-inaccuracy-under-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
