<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSX zip files have extra&#160;junk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/01/17/osx-zip-files-have-extra-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/01/17/osx-zip-files-have-extra-junk/</link>
	<description>the personal weblog of paul burd, multimedia designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/01/17/osx-zip-files-have-extra-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-3542</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=912#comment-3542</guid>
		<description>Allas, nice as cleanarchiver may seem, it won&#039;t make archives that are able to store the required meta-data for some installers, even when not excluding the &#039;extra junk&#039;. So, it&#039;s nice for sending images or other binary data, but useless when sending apps.

But, you&#039;re right, Apple should&#039;ve included a preference setting for the &#039;extra junk&#039; so we wouldn&#039;t need an extra tool just to make clean archives. Now I go on in search of a stuffit uninstaller for my mac :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allas, nice as cleanarchiver may seem, it won&#8217;t make archives that are able to store the required meta-data for some installers, even when not excluding the &#8216;extra junk&#8217;. So, it&#8217;s nice for sending images or other binary data, but useless when sending apps.</p>
<p>But, you&#8217;re right, Apple should&#8217;ve included a preference setting for the &#8216;extra junk&#8217; so we wouldn&#8217;t need an extra tool just to make clean archives. Now I go on in search of a stuffit uninstaller for my mac :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/01/17/osx-zip-files-have-extra-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=912#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was referring to standard zip files in all 3 cases (OSX, Stuffit, and CleanArchiver). I don&#039;t use sit, or any of the other Stuffit formats. CleanArchiver gives you the option to omit the extra files, and I am assuming Stuffit does it by default.

I was decompressing the files on the PC using the capabilities built into Windows XP. I don&#039;t have Stuffit installed.

Apple could have given us a preference that would allow us to include or omit the extra files for greatest compatibility. The Apple mail program does this with attachments by giving us a &quot;Windows Friendly&quot; preference. They should have done this with zip files as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was referring to standard zip files in all 3 cases (OSX, Stuffit, and CleanArchiver). I don&#8217;t use sit, or any of the other Stuffit formats. CleanArchiver gives you the option to omit the extra files, and I am assuming Stuffit does it by default.</p>
<p>I was decompressing the files on the PC using the capabilities built into Windows XP. I don&#8217;t have Stuffit installed.</p>
<p>Apple could have given us a preference that would allow us to include or omit the extra files for greatest compatibility. The Apple mail program does this with attachments by giving us a &#8220;Windows Friendly&#8221; preference. They should have done this with zip files as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kooz</title>
		<link>http://www.onedigitallife.com/2006/01/17/osx-zip-files-have-extra-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kooz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onedigitallife.com/?p=912#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>The extra &#039;junk&#039; are the metadata that make the MacOS user experience so much nicer than Windows. The &quot;zip&quot; file format was not designed with Mac OS metadata in mind, so the additional stuff gets stored in the __MACOSX objects. On the Mac, the experience is seamless, but on Windows it isn&#039;t. Apple wanted to use a standard archive format, so they didn&#039;t have many options. StuffIt Deluxe doesn&#039;t have the same problem because they designed their own archive format (and it was a Mac program first), and they write both the Mac and Windows versions of the software. Their archives are proprietary and probably contain the extra &#039;junk&#039; but their program ignores it on Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extra &#8216;junk&#8217; are the metadata that make the MacOS user experience so much nicer than Windows. The &#8220;zip&#8221; file format was not designed with Mac OS metadata in mind, so the additional stuff gets stored in the __MACOSX objects. On the Mac, the experience is seamless, but on Windows it isn&#8217;t. Apple wanted to use a standard archive format, so they didn&#8217;t have many options. StuffIt Deluxe doesn&#8217;t have the same problem because they designed their own archive format (and it was a Mac program first), and they write both the Mac and Windows versions of the software. Their archives are proprietary and probably contain the extra &#8216;junk&#8217; but their program ignores it on Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
